RASC Calgary Centre - The Expansion of the Universe

By: Larry McNish
Page last updated: March 17, 2012


Question: What is The Expansion of the Universe?

Answer: The Expansion of the Universe is the increase of distance between objects in the Universe over time. Measurements of very distant objects (quasars, and galaxies) have shown that the further away they are from us, the faster they are receding (moving away) from us. This is NOT due to their own motion within the Universe. Space itself is expanding, "pushing" or "carrying" objects apart. And this speed is increasing with time (accelerating).

The Expansion of the Universe:
  • - initially started due to the pressure created at the Big Bang
  • - underwent a hugely stupendous rate of growth during the early period of the Big Bang called "Inflation"
  • - just as strangely, stopped this stupendous expansion even before the first stars were formed
  • - was believed for a long time to be "slowing down" i.e. "held back" by the gravitational self-attraction of matter, then by matter plus "Dark Matter". Dark matter is a huge amount of mass (matter) that does not interact the same way "ordinary matter" does in the universe. It does not generate, reflect, or absorb light, hence they called it "Dark", and its presence is detected only because of its gravity affecting other normal matter, or its gravity bending light from more distant objects.
  • - has recently been shown to be increasing in speed (i.e. accelerating) by teams of astronomers studying very distant supernovae.
This acceleration is attributed to something unknown - astrophysicists have given it the popular name "Dark Energy" but this is merely to have some sort of name for this process. It's not clear that this is energy in any sense we can conceive of.

Where Dark Energy gets the energy from to accomplish accelerating the growth of the entire Universe is unknown, and why it took several billion years to overcome the deceleration due to matter and dark matter is also unknown.

This expansion applies to intergalactic space but NOT the things in it - which are held together by the other forces of nature - gravity (on smaller scales), electromagnetism and the strong nuclear force. On scales like our Solar System and all the galaxies in our Local Group, normal gravity is stronger. In fact, the huge Andromeda Galaxy, which is 2.5 million light years distant is actually heading towards us (or us towards them).

According to Einstein's Theory of Relativity, although things "in space" cannot travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, space itself is unrestricted and can expand beyond this "speed limit". [Einstein showed that matter cannot travel at or faster than light, but since "space" is not "matter" the speed limit does not apply.]

Objects (quasars, blazers, pulsars, and entire galaxy clusters) that are very, very distant may be "carried away" from us at faster-than-light speeds as the universe expands. In this case, we will never see them - their light itself is travelling slower than the expansion rate creating more distance between us per second than light can traverse in the same time. Such light has a losing battle trying to get to us, and therefore we will never see it.

This means that there is a limit to how far we can see anything. All objects in the universe beyond that distance are undetectable. This "cosmic distance limit" defines the dimensions of our "Observable Universe" which is almost certainly only a small part of the Entire Universe.

If you lived on a planet around a star in a galaxy at the edge of the Earth's observable universe, you would see your "quadrant" but even further away from our direction would be your own distance limit, perhaps containing another "quadrant" that cannot be seen from that position. And so on, perhaps to infinity.

The diagram below puts several of these items together into one "Inflationary Cosmology" timeline for our Universe.



The Standard Model of Inflationary Cosmology (Credit: NASA/WMAP, additional annotation by the author.)
Of course we can never achieve a view like this from "outside" our Universe.
More information about the WMAP results can be found here.


Bonus Answer - Why The Universe has no "Centre" of Expansion:

The Expansion of the Universe 1 - Now, centered on our galaxy
Fig. 1
This is a representation of our galaxy (in the white circle) among
many others in the nearby universe. They are shown evenly
spaced here on the blue grid, just to illustrate the following
points. (A neighbouring galaxy is shown circled in gray.)

Click the image for a larger view.

The Expansion of the Universe - Future, centered on our galaxy
Fig. 2
In the future, the Universe (i.e. the space between the galaxies)
expands equally in all directions, represented here by the larger
"boxes" of the orange grid. Note that the expansion is equal in
all directions, but the galaxies themselves do not expand.

Click the image for a larger view.

The Expansion of the Universe 3 - Present and Future overlaid, centered on our galaxy
Fig. 3
Here, the "Future" view (orange) is overlaid on the "Present" view (blue), centered on our galaxy. Note that our neighbouring galaxy (circled in gray) has moved away from us, but so have all the others. In addition, the more distant galaxies have moved away a greater amount than the closer ones. This view also seems to indicate that WE are at the "Center of the Universe". Also note that the galaxies further away have moved a greater distance from us in the same amount of time. This is the Cosmological Redshift.

Click the image for a larger view.

The Expansion of the Universe 4 - Present and Future overlaid, centered on another galaxy
Fig. 4
However, if we take the exact same Fig. 2. and overlay it on Fig. 1, but centre it on our neighbouring galaxy (i.e. its point of view), then that galaxy seems to be the "Centre of the Universe", and WE have moved away from IT. Clearly there cannot be TWO "Centres of the Universe", and if we repeat this overlay for every galaxy in Fig. 1, it would seem that EVERY galaxy is at the "Center of their Universe" (from their point of view). But at the same time, they are all NOT the centre from every other galaxy's point of view. The only possible explanation is that although everybody "thinks" they are at the centre, NO ONE is.

Click the image for a larger view.



IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER ABOUT THE DIAGRAMS ABOVE

The diagrams above serve to make the point I wanted, but they are not valid because:
  1. The expansion of the universe is detectable only over very, very large distances.
  2. It is super-sized clusters of galaxies with immense voids between them that are moving apart.
  3. Within galaxies and even within clusters of galaxies, the common gravitational attraction is much stronger than whatever is pushing the superclusters apart, so the expansion of the universe is not apparent on most of the scales we use to measure distance.
  4. Galaxies are not all the same.
  5. Galaxies are not evenly, regularly spaced.
  6. The images are 2-dimensional, whereas space is expanding in 3 dimensions.
The Universe at a very large scale

The Universe at a very large scale. Credit: The Millennium Simulation Project of the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics.

In the simulated image above, everything visible is a supercluster of galaxies. It is the dark "space" between them that is expanding.


WHAT IS THE UNIVERSE EXPANDING INTO?

There are two common analogies used to try to demonstrate the expansion of the space in our Universe:
  • dots on the surface of an expanding rubber balloon - the dots don't grow (much) but the balloon (the Universe) does
  • a rising loaf of raisin bread - this is a better 3D analogy, and even though we cannot see the raisins inside, we know that it is the bread (their universe) that is expanding, not the raisins.
Unfortunately, in both of these cases, the balloon or bread is expanding into the air around it, so they are not true analogies. You would have to be a 2-dimensional "thing" living on the surface of the balloon, or a three dimensional "thing" living inside the rising loaf of bread to truly have a similar experience as to what we observe in the Universe. (A raisin inside a loaf of bread has a very limited view of bread dough or the bread's "crust". However, we (who live "outside" that universe) have a different i.e. better view of what is going on.)

There's another "cop-out" explanation - The word "Universe" means "All existing matter, energy and space considered as a whole, (also called 'The Cosmos')". If the "Universe" is everything, then there is nothing else and so the Universe cannot be expanding into it. Nice, but this does not really help.

There is no simple answer. And, because we have an "Observable Universe" distance limit, we cannot precisely determine the answer. However, we can "speculate" about it.

One of these speculations is that there are other universes (which contradicts the dictionary definition of 'Universe'). Each of these separate universes could have been created in their own "big bangs" and are expanding into ... well we need a new term for that, so astrophysicists that work on this solution have dubbed it "The Multiverse". Great - so this hypothesis states that our Universe is one "bubble" expanding into the "Multiverse". If so, then all universes could be expanding into the Multiverse - and does that mean the Multiverse is expanding? And, if so, what is IT expanding into? Nice, but this does not really help either.

Another speculation is that the Big Bang created a stupendously enormous amount of "empty space" in our Universe, that all the matter is now expanding into, possibly an infinite amount of empty space exists beyond any observable distance. The little bit that we live in is expanding, but there is perhaps lots of room left to fill. Nice, but this raises the very similar question "What is beyond the end of the Universe?"

Other theories speculate that "space is curved" so that, even if you could travel faster than light in a "straight line", you would simply be following curved space and end up back where you started (after a journey of several billion years). So, no answer there, either.

The simplest answer is: WE DON'T KNOW - because we cannot get to a location "outside the universe" to see the entire universe and beyond. AND WE MAY NEVER KNOW - if the answer requires such a viewpoint.

So. There you have it. This question is not answerable at this time, and may never be satisfactorily answered by anyone.


Return to main page